Marine Le Pen Quotes

War can be prevented only by broad-minded statesmanship - a statesmanship that understands how to enlist people's interests in a leading cause.

An increasingly multipolar world requires an entirely different kind of U.S. foreign policy: far from being unilateralist, it necessitates a complex form of power-sharing on both a global and regional basis.

I don't think Russia is setting this as a goal; I don't think this should be Russia's goal. I think even the United States doesn't need to be a superpower. China doesn't need to be a superpower. It's a different world.

The UN is ultimately going to be judged on its ability in conflict resolution and conflict prevention.

Today we will find most nations to be both our partners and our adversaries—sometimes simultaneously.

We do not believe that good relations with one country precludes good relations with another.

The day is coming when no single nation, however powerful, can undertake by itself to keep the peace outside its borders.

India is a country that has no direct interests in some areas of global conflict. It has very good relations with countries in conflict or countries facing difficult security situations, and I believe Indian diplomacy is very well received. India is a bridge-builder, an honest broker, and a messenger of peace.

I'm not aiming for the Nobel Peace Prize!

I don't want to force the peacekeeping nations to feel like I'm pushing them out.

In a multipolar world, there must be more powers capable of taking responsibility, the U.S. and Europe must be able to unite to achieve peace in the Middle East.

International politics is no longer a zero-sum game but a multi-dimensional arena where cooperation and competition often occur simultaneously. Gone is the age of blood feuds. World leaders are expected to lead in turning threats into opportunities.

There are nearly 200 countries and a population of over 6 billion in today's world. International affairs should be addressed by all countries through consultations rather than monopolised by a few powers.

American foreign policy, for all its shortcomings, has underpinned political stability around the world.

World peace is no longer some pie-in-the-sky thing, because no single person or country is going to solve it on their own.

I've been quite involved in a lot of U.N. operations over the years. I was a U.N. observer at the East Timor referendum in 2000. I've been very involved in that for a long time.

It is a commonplace that the League of Nations is not yet-what its most enthusiastic protagonists intended it to be.

There are big issues, like the reform of the Security Council. These kinds of questions are something the President of the General Assembly must keep his eye on.

Our civilization is now in the transition stage between the age of warring empires and a new age of world unity and peace.

Here we encounter two conflicting concepts with which we must come to grips in our time: the idea of national solidarity and the idea of international cooperation.

I very much hope that the United States will finally... realise that they can no longer act as the prosecutor, the judge, and the executioner in every part of the world and that they need to cooperate to resolve issues.

Intervention continues to be a prominent dimension of the post-cold war world.

Of course the UN brings in a lot of moral authority.

The European organisation contemplated could not oppose any ethnic group, on other continents or in Europe itself, outside of the League of Nations, any more than it could oppose the League of Nations.

The most tragic paradox of our time is to be found in the failure of nation-states to recognize the imperatives of internationalism.