Alex Berenson Quotes

If very fundamental reforms take place, especially when it comes to factors of production like land, labour, then a higher growth rate is possible.

India needs to sustain its high growth rate.

We had massive tax cuts in the early phases of the [George W.] Bush years… The decade following was the worst growth rate in over 60 years.

Our most important priority is sustained economic growth, and I think we can absolutely get to sustained 3% to 4% GDP, and that is absolutely critical for the country.

I believe that high, sustainable growth rates can only be possible on the basis of macro-stability.

While monetary policy can contribute to growth by supporting a durable expansion in a context of price stability, it cannot reliably affect the long-run sustainable level of the economy's growth.

There is much that remains mysterious about why some countries grow rapidly and some grow slowly.

If the economy grows, housing gets better, quicker.

If history judges society for how it treats those in need, so markets judge economies by the incentives they provide for private investment, the infrastructure that supports growth, and the burdens placed on job creation.

It is absolutely clear that government plays a key role, as a catalyst, in promoting long-run growth.

We are determined to improve the economic environment by getting foreign investors in and by cutting red tape.

I think 4 percent growth is a good goal. And I think the fact that we have become used to an economy that sort of putt putts along between 1 and 2 percent is sort of tragic.

At the same time, we are keenly aware that China is still the largest developing country in the world and we need to make long and hard efforts if we are to build a moderately prosperous society in all respects and basically achieve modernization.

No one has developed a magic formula for how to make countries grow, though economic researchers have identified a number of poisons. Corruption, overweening government intervention, and mountains of debt are contraindicated for countries attempting to develop.

We perceive political stability to be the first necessity of economic development.

Our problem number 1, 2 and 3 is economic development.

Fortunately for India, it has got a growing economy. If it is doing the right things with taxation and focusing on the right areas for human development, it is going to have no problem, over a period of time, taking care of its own needs.

All I'll say is if you look at countries where it is - where they are rapidly growing, they're investing in their infrastructure. They're investing in their educations. They are trying to streamline regulations, but they're not neglecting key investments.

Venezuela needs to develop; economic growth is essential for the country after so many years of lagging behind.

We got two examples in recent history from this country. One in the '80s under President Reagan. One under President Clinton and the Democratic-controlled Congress in the '90s. We had nearly 5 percent growth rate in each of those decades. We can do it again for sure.

Across all economies, the imperative is to take actions that boost potential output, improve inclusiveness, and strengthen resilience.

We need a national focus on increasing the sustainable growth rate of our economy.

The world economy is growing so fast.

The industrial world enjoys a rare combination of growth and low inflation; the 'Washington consensus,' a model of economic development that emphasizes macroeconomic discipline and open markets, is being adopted by more countries.

Great economies and great nations, prosperity, and abundance of nations and communities are created by men and not spirits.