Maciej Kranz Quotes

First, our focus on security is on the infrastructure itself. So it is all about how you protect the network, the device, and the application that is riding on the server.

Security can be enhanced with hardware. You can have a software-only solution, but it can be made more robust in conjunction with hardware.

It was immediately clear to me that security was a cross-cutting issue, so rather than dividing the space up in parallel with each of the other areas, I wanted security cut across the areas in addition to having its own content.

You have to have as many defences in place as you possibly can. But even then of course - and it's important to stress this - you cannot guarantee being able to prevent every attack or every kind of attack.

There is no secure data center in the world; they have all been broken into. We can help you prepare for it and minimize the damage when it does occur.

Effective cyber-security should be considered an investment.

Too many public and private entities simply don't take advantage of tools already at their disposal to protect themselves from hackers. No amount of information sharing will help solve that problem.

Increasing cyber-physical system complexity brings security challenges as well as privacy challenges.

Any security issues, you have to be very hands on to really understand what's the exact problem, and then take quick action.

I don't want to be only the most scalable platform, I want to be the most secure. To do that, it's not only Zoom's work, we need lot of people's help.

We must have the strictest adherence to security procedures to protect against compromise by hostile foreign powers.

I have spent my career building and improving secure, trustworthy systems, and I am very proud to be working on security at Yahoo.

I don't expect an overnight change of all desktops to what the US Military used to call B3 level security. And even that would not stop users from shooting themselves into the foot.

The gatekeepers must change.

Security is, I would say, our top priority because for all the exciting things you will be able to do with computers - organizing your lives, staying in touch with people, being creative - if we don't solve these security problems, then people will hold back.

They have a beautiful security system and we're emulating the whole security infrastructure.

Security is like virginity: you're either a virgin or you're not. You either have security or you don't.

Some brains are easy to hack into, and other brains are nearly impossible to hack into because they are so complex.

I learned the technology and tradecraft of electronic security in self defense, with a lot of expert help.

In a sense, communications networks can be defined entirely by who has cryptographic keys, and I think a lot of networks will work that way in the future.

I'm just not security-minded.

Nothing is absolute in security.

So ensuring the integrity of the data and integrity and validity of the connection is a very important element in any company's strategy that is moving towards a Web service paradigm.

It's simply unrealistic to depend on secrecy for security in computer software. You may be able to keep the exact workings of the program out of general circulation, but can you prevent the code from being reverse-engineered by serious opponents? Probably not. The secret to strong security: less reliance on secrets.

'Firewall' seems both scary and protective at the same time. And how often does that happen within one word besides 'military' and 'government?'