Bill Browder Quotes

On Putin's order, Russian security services try to destabilize NATO allies the U.S. has sworn to defend.

Other than being crazy enough to press a button, there is nothing that Putin can do militarily to fundamentally alter American interests.

If Russia and the United States approach each other in starkly adversarial terms, the conflict will badly warp the foreign policy of both countries ...

I don't think Russia could start a war by attacking any of the NATO member states.

The unthinkable occurred: two communist countries went to war with each other.

With regards to the expansion of NATO, I see it as a mistake, even a provocation in a way.

You know, in the WikiLeaks cables, the Chinese discovered that Kevin Rudd was urging the Americans to keep the military option open against them. This is hardly a friendly gesture.

The West will have to choose: either to come to terms with Russians, or to receive a retaliatory blow. This retaliatory blow will not be by means of war. We will resort to the same weapon: nationalism.

We ought to nuke North Korea right about now just to give the world a warning.

From little involvements—little CIA wars—big wars grow.

If Americans are entitled to hit Iraq unilaterally, then why isn't Russia entitled to the same with respect to Georgia? Why is China not entitled to the same with respect to some other neighboring country which, according to Chinese views, may be supporting insurrection in Tibet or Shenyang? Why, say, India is not entitled to hit Pakistan, which openly supports terrorists in Kashmir and which has nuclear weapons, and which has a very fragile domestic situation under which fundamentalists any day can come to power

These four mongrels are supposed to be our defense against Communism and the extremes of Arab Nationalism in the Middle East.

U.S. analysts estimate that Russian military expenditures have tripled during the Bush-Putin years, in large measure a predicted reaction to the Bush administration's militancy and aggressiveness.

Russia isn't likely to have any more military success in Syria and Iraq than has the United States.

I'm very concerned about the countries bordering Russia. But let's stay off that stuff.

Mitt Romney said many years ago that he thought Russia was the single biggest geopolitical threat to the United States and their presence in a variety of conflicts of one type or another have borne out much of what Mitt Romney said.

America is carrying out policies against Russia and its leadership. They know I'm among those ready to give my life for Russia and that I have a good army capable of attacking and defending. We'll see who comes out on top.

The crises in North Korea, Iran, the Middle East, show how quickly things can change and how they can go wrong. We must be prepared. And right now the Army is not.

If all Europe lies flat while the Russian mob tramps over it, we will then be faced with a war under difficult circumstances, and with a very good chance of losing it.

Putin sought to destabilize Ukraine's economy.

Iran is a major threat to the well-being of Europe and America just as much as it is for the state of Israel.

As I've said many times and publicly, a war between China and Taiwan that involves the United States is a lose-lose-lose.

We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

Many agree that the worst thing that could ever happen is if Russia and China get closer.

I don't think that anyone seriously fears that the world can be blown to pieces all together. But what one can fear and rightly so are regional things, like in the Middle East, India, Pakistan, the Korean Peninsula, borders in Africa, etc.