ROBERT J. KAISER

This practice to try and derail bills they objected to emanated from the hyperpartisanship of the time. The conservative base of voters so opposed the legislation that they would not punish and not vote for a member of Congress for deliberately lying as long as the lies contributed to the conservative political ideology. Some of the members had this as a justification for lying in this way: “These provisions are exactly what the Democrats would add as an amendment or by regulations if they could. It is important that the voters know that they will do if the legislation passes and realize that they people who support this terrible legislation really desire to socialize the American Economy.” Often, they would base their judgment about what the Democrats wanted by taking a single statement made by someone at the extreme left and claim that that was Democratic party thinking. The tactic worked in a number of cases, but not with Dodd-Frank which passed despite a Republican filibuster in the Senate. Some of the extreme liberals in Congress then started to use the techniques in the House of Representatives where they were in the minority.

The objective of a large proportion of the Congress then was not to improve the nation or even pass legislation, but to preserve their ideology and attack and weaken the other party. Compromise for example is probably the best legislative practice, but that Congress had a substantial number of Tea Party and other ultra conservatives who believed that any compromise at all was an immoral abandonment of principle.

The Congress at that time was mired down in hyperpartisanship and accomplished very little.

the largest economic and banking reform in decades The Dodd-Frank reform legislation was very complicated. It was extensively debated including attacks against provisions that were not even in the bill (See {632833}.) Few of the supporters and fewer of the opponents understood the bill. Many members on both sides had not even read the entire bill. It passed.

The situation was actually worse as many of the best member of Congress from both parties were refusing to serve again and not running for re-election even where they had huge approval and popularity at home. Barney Frank and Olympia Snowe were then the latest examples.

The Congress at the time was one of the worst in American history, accomplishing little more than nothing, mired in gridlock and ideological hyperpartisanship, with little concern for the nation as a whole. Other critics observe that it is the voting public that elected and re-elected the Congress and therefore must share the responsibility.

This practice to try and derail bills they objected to emanated from the hyperpartisanship of the time. The conservative base of voters so opposed the legislation that they would not punish and not vote for a member of Congress for deliberately lying as long as the lies contributed to the conservative political ideology. Some of the members had this as a justification for lying in this way: “These provisions are exactly what the Democrats would add as an amendment or by regulations if they could. It is important that the voters know that they will do if the legislation passes and realize that they people who support this terrible legislation really desire to socialize the American Economy.” Often, they would base their judgment about what the Democrats wanted by taking a single statement made by someone at the extreme left and claim that that was Democratic party thinking. The tactic worked in a number of cases, but not with Dodd-Frank which passed despite a Republican filibuster in the Senate. Some of the extreme liberals in Congress then started to use the techniques in the House of Representatives where they were in the minority.

The Congress at that time was mired down in hyperpartisanship and accomplished very little.

The situation was actually worse as many of the best member of Congress from both parties were refusing to serve again and not running for re-election even where they had huge approval and popularity at home. Barney Frank and Olympia Snowe were then the latest examples.

the largest economic and banking reform in decades The Dodd-Frank reform legislation was very complicated. It was extensively debated including attacks against provisions that were not even in the bill (See {632833}.) Few of the supporters and fewer of the opponents understood the bill. Many members on both sides had not even read the entire bill. It passed.

The objective of a large proportion of the Congress then was not to improve the nation or even pass legislation, but to preserve their ideology and attack and weaken the other party. Compromise for example is probably the best legislative practice, but that Congress had a substantial number of Tea Party and other ultra conservatives who believed that any compromise at all was an immoral abandonment of principle.

The Congress at the time was one of the worst in American history, accomplishing little more than nothing, mired in gridlock and ideological hyperpartisanship, with little concern for the nation as a whole. Other critics observe that it is the voting public that elected and re-elected the Congress and therefore must share the responsibility.