DAVID BROCK

The truth is that the more responsible the media outlet, the more responsive they are to constructive criticism.

I'm a former, living, breathing, right-wing conspirator.

You get to a point where the factual adjudication doesn't matter because there are all these other outlets that are far less responsible, all talking about the ad, some of which have a political reason for promoting it.

There's every financial incentive in the world to stay in the conservative movement forever.

Criticizing Fox News has nothing to do with criticizing the press. Fox News is not a news organization. It is the de facto leader of the GOP, and it is long past time that it is treated as such by the media, elected officials and the public.

It's all a sham: I have seen, and I know firsthand, indeed from my own pen, how the organized Right has sabotaged not only journalism but also democracy and truth.

I'm an incredibly hard worker, I'm incredibly tenacious, and I'm incredibly detail-oriented.

I didn't wake up one day and say, you know, 'Supply-side economics doesn't make sense.'

I've been interested in watching the level of conservative misinformation that circulates through the media.

I was a bad journalist.

I'm kind of a builder of institutions. I think I've got some ability to look at what's out here, look at a playing field, and identify gaps and niches.

The right can distort anything it wants.

Editors of conservative magazines aren't out trying to raise money. The money is there; the cash reserves are in the bank.

It's very important to understand that the 'Talk' piece was not an excerpt, it was an adaptation, which means I compressed different parts of the book and made a new piece.

During the '90s the flow of misinformation was established.

Eventually the story would spill over into the regular media.

When I wrote the Anita Hill book I believed everything I wrote was accurate.

It is an outrage that Donald Trump can swear and scream on national television and no one says boo about how he presents himself.

Progressives are not going to give up on facts.

I don't think the candidate would be directly responsible for things that their supporters say, but when it gets to a certain level, they ought to say, 'Cut it out.'

When most people find themselves running afoul of the law, they might change their ways. When the Koch brothers found themselves running afoul of the law, David Koch decided to run for office so that he could change the law.

I want an audience that's passionate, that can be engaged.

Republicans tend to be more steadfast in their allegiance, and Democrats read one headline in the 'New York Times,' and the sky is suddenly falling.

There was a slow-motion swift boating of Hillary Clinton in '15.

Bill Clinton's legacy on job creation should be assailed by none and admired by every presidential candidate who hopes to do the same.