Test cricket is still important, so are ODIs, but T20 should be there too because of the crowd factor.
I love to play Test cricket; it's the main cricket.
I love the multi-format series. Within it they've found a way to retain Test matches and England v Australia in the Test arena, they were always my favourite matches to play in.
Traditional cricket has gone out of the window. It's gone. T20 cricket has changed the game.
Time has never really been an issue in Test cricket, especially in the modern game where things naturally move quicker than they have in the past.
When I watch Twenty20 cricket, there's a different satisfaction. That hundred you get in six hours is a very satisfying feeling. A real triumph of skill. I don't quite see that in the 20-over game - or the 100-ball game.
I think Test cricket is the ultimate form of cricket.
Call me traditional, but Test cricket is the most important thing.
For me Test cricket is the ultimate.
Pujara is not fashionable, he's very much old-fashioned - he's not great between the wickets and he's not a modern, extravagant, in-your-face character like Kohli, Dhawan or Pandya.
Village cricket spread fast through the land.
No matter what, Test cricket will survive. I've always said Twenty20 would be popular but there will be a place for Test cricket.
One thing common with me and Shikhar Dhawan is that we play a lot of orthodox cricketing strokes. We look to play the ball along the ground and while lofting the ball, it's more with a vertical bat.
Village cricket spread fast through the land. In those days before it became scientific, cricket was the best game in the world to watch, with its rapid sequence of amusing incidents, each ball a potential crisis!
