What drugs haven't destroyed, the war against them has
I'm not ashamed to admit that prohibition is 'impractical.'
In fact, the whole thing about prohibition is this: it isn't the initial cost, it's the humidity.
I'd like to have every gentleman and lady in this room commit themselves to get our government to legalize drugs. So they have to get it through a doctor, not just some gangsters who sell it under the table. Let's legalize drugs like they did in Amsterdam. No one's hiding or sneaking around corners to get it. They go to a doctor to get it.
There are just so many substances that are considered banned substances because in some way it could help your performance on the court. As athletes, we should be responsible for what we put in our bodies.
America didn't have a drug problem before it passed drug laws. While drugs were consumed by large numbers of people — the number of women habituated to the opium found in laudanum was, no pun intended, staggering — they were, for the most part, easily able to live their lives, do their jobs, and raise their families pretty much the way we do today.
If alcohol is legal, I don't see why people still have a ban on marijuana.
Marijuana should be licensed and kept out of the hands of teenagers. It's too good for them.
There is absolutely no difference between alcohol prohibition and drug prohibition except the drug being prohibited.
What drugs have not destroyed, the war on them has
If ur going to have a war on drugs, have them against ALL drugs, including alcohol, the number one offender.
Marijuana is not much more difficult to obtain than beer. The reason for this is that a liquor store selling beer to a minor stands to lose its liquor license. Marijuana salesmen don't have expensive overheads, and so are not easily punished.
Alcohol remained, and remains, a vital instrument of social control, used without any regard to its horrifying consequences in addiction and violence.
I'll be seeking professional help with regards to alcohol and, until myself and the club feel this is under control, I'll be off the drink.
We cannot eradicate global drug markets, but we can certainly regulate them as we have done with alcohol and tobacco markets. Drug abuse, alcoholism and tobacco should be treated as public health problems, not criminal justice issues.
This day we have held a council, and it is agreed by the Shawnee in general that whatever rum is in our towns shall be broke and split and not drunk; and whosoever shall bring any rum or any sort of strong drink into our towns, Indian or white man, let it be little or much, it shall be broke or split in the presence of the whole town…
Legalize it. Regulate it. Tax it... The arguments against marijuana today are the same as the arguments against liquor years ago.
If you have children, you don't want to have drugs and drinks in the house. It's just not good.
I agree with my colleagues, even the one who just preceded me, that marijuana is probably a dangerous drug, and I would not suggest that we do anything to encourage its use.
Alcohol, tobacco, and pharmaceutical drugs are legal, but they can hurt a lot of people.
The choice is not between drugs and no drugs, but between illegal drugs and legal drugs. Until the 1920s drugs were legal, why not now? Lots of people are on drugs anyway - it is called medication.
We spend billions and billions to fight drugs but, comparatively, spend nothing against alcohol. And alcohol is a drug.
Explaining why he wants alcohol-ad warnings in all alcohol ads:
Testosterone should be a controlled substance.
If the principle is, "Let's not get lethal substances out to the public", the first one you'd go after is tobacco. The next one you'd go after is alcohol. Way down the list you'd get to cocaine, and sort of invisibly low you'd get to marijuana.
It is time to tax and regulate marijuana like alcohol. It is time to end the arrests of so many people and the destruction of so many lives for possessing marijuana.