All my adult life, I have lived with Labour lies about tax cuts. Their cry is always the same. Tax cuts are impossible in a civilised society. They mean less revenue for the state, which means sacked teachers, unemployed doctors, fewer nurses. I am amazed anyone still takes such arrant twaddle seriously.
My tax cut would cut hundreds of billions of dollars. So to do it, you have to be willing to cut spending, too. But if you were to cut hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes, that money's left in communities.
[T]ax cuts are not just something that all taxpayers deserve, but also the best way to curb government spending. It is the best kind of tax reform. If the money never reaches the table, Congress can't gobble it up.
The [Donald] Trump plan would increase the national debt a little over a $1 trillion a year, the Trump plan would reduce taxes at all income levels with, of course, the biggest tax cuts going to the richest taxpayers as they always do.
The net effect of cutting commercials in half is a fairly serious economic reality for Premier - and for me.
We must move from revenue-neutral to revenue-reducing tax reform, because the federal government spends far too much money.
When is the last time we had a tax cut before going to war?
Advocating canceling one year of the tax cuts for the wealthiest people to pay for the Iraq War.
I cut the taxes on everybody. I didn't cut them. The Congress cut them. I asked them to cut them.
When you have less revenue coming in the door, you have more money going out the door. You have to find ways of trimming.
will stifle economic growth, destroy jobs, reduce revenues, and increase the deficit.
Consequently many large railroad systems of heavy capitalization bid fair to run into difficulties on the first serious falling off in general business.
How many businesses do you know that want to cut their revenue in half? That's why the healthcare system won't change the healthcare system.