Privacy Regulations Quotes

I certainly respect privacy and privacy rights. But on the other hand, the first function of government is to guarantee the security of all the people.

Hopefully, the world will not have a lot of different privacy standards requirements--particularly some commonality between the United States and Europe.

I am a deeply committed conservative who wants to keep maximal privacy for every U.S. citizen.

Instead of using new technologies to preserve for ready discovery material that might in the past never have been stored, or deleting everything as soon as possible, we can develop systems that place sensitive information beyond reach until a specified amount of time has passed or other conditions are met.

[Behavioral tracking] is an area today that has very few regulations and even fewer rules.

We live in a moment in history in which our privacy may not be important.

I believe that it is critical for this country to have a zone of privacy —– for everyone,

I like to keep some privacy, be a normal person.

The institutions that we've built up over the years to protect our individual privacy rights from the government don't apply to the private sector. The Fourth Amendment doesn't apply to corporations. The Freedom of Information Act doesn't apply to Silicon Valley. And you can't impeach Google if it breaks its 'Don't be evil' campaign pledge.

Like all security, privacy is hard.

This has been a learning experience for me. I also thought that privacy was something we were granted in the Constitution. I have learned from this when in fact the word privacy does not appear in the Constitution.

I have certain rules for snooping, under which anything out in the open is fair game. But I also think, in light of some current trends in our culture, that privacy should be respected.

I believe in my privacy. I always have, and I always will. I don't think that my private life needs to be on display for me to get a better response at the box office or for me to get a better choice of movies.

I apologize to all of my colleagues who've been writing up storms, but as a culture we've essentially put ourselves into a position where Mark Zuckerberg can say, "Privacy as a social norm is no longer relevant," and a lot of people don't blink an eye.

The only thing privacy laws accomplish is making the bugs smaller.

The Microsoft actions announced today are exactly the kinds of industry initiatives we need. Microsoft is using its resources to bring real privacy protection to Internet users by creating incentives for more websites to provide strong privacy protection.

We need to start seeing privacy as a commons - as some kind of a public good that can get depleted as too many people treat it carelessly or abandon it too eagerly. What is privacy for? This question needs an urgent answer.

I like my privacy as much as the next one, but I am compelled to admit that government has a right to invade it unless prohibited by some specific Constitutional provision.

Well firstly, that points certainly at the need for international standards on biometrics that would move in the same direction so that we can have the same technical requirements.

It’s an unfortunate and wonderful characteristic of America that we protect privacy for no reason.

If the director of the department doesn't even know what the privacy policy is, we are in trouble.

Businesses that make consumer privacy a point of competitive differentiation will enjoy greater customer loyalty.

It's certainly important for people to have a sense of privacy.

It is both impractical and very harmful for each state to enact differing and conflicting privacy burdens on broadband providers, many of which serve multiple states, if not the entire country.

But the time has come for journalists to acknowledge that a zone of privacy does exist.