There is no peace, I'm sorry to say. We find it. We lose it. We find it again. We lose it again.
Of course, everybody says they're for peace. Hitler was for peace. Everybody is for peace. The question is: What kind of peace?
Peace, ... is crucial, because my government aims to hasten Mindanao's development by transforming it into the country's food basket.
To get home you had to end the war. To end the war was the reason you fought it. The only reason.
It is an ever-growing belief with me that truth cannot be found by violent means.
If we [are to] reach a situation of true peace, real peace, peace for generations, we will have to make painful concessions. Not in exchange for promises, but rather in exchange for peace.
We wanted peace and we wanted to come to terms with the Israelis.
In war the olive branch of peace is of use. [Lat., Adjuvat in bello pacatae ramus olivae.]
Sadly, a prize for peace is a rarity in this world. Most nations have monuments or memorials to war, bronze salutations to heroic battles, archways of triumph. But peace has no parade, no pantheon of victory.
To be peacemaker, you must know the peace giver.
I am for peace. And I am for a negotiated peace. But this accord is not a just peace.
We speak of peace, yes, but whose peace? Poland's? Bulgaria's? The peace of the grave?
I say that Hitler ought to have the peace prize, because he is removing all the elements of contest and of struggle from Germany. By driving out the Jews and the democratic and Left element, he is driving out everything that conduces to activity. That means peace ... By suppressing Jews ... he was ending struggle in Germany.
Peace demands the most heroic labor and the most difficult sacrifice.
That piecemeal peace is poor peace. What pure peace allows Alarms of wars, the daunting wars, the death of it?
The terms of peace may be negotiated by political leaders, but the fate of peace is up to each of us.
