We don't think that we are in a quarrel with anybody. We may have a difference of opinion, but we'll not allow such differences of opinion to grow into a problem that stands in the way of reconstructing the country and regaining the democratic path.
I will listen to you, especially when we disagree.
The key is that when we disagree, we really hear the other one out and agree that there is a more elegant solution than one of us 'winning.'
Dissension is healthy, even when it gets loud.
We have to see conflict as thinking and then get really good at it.
I think Donald Trump's reaching out and supporting John McCain and Kelly Ayotte in particular, and Paul Ryan, who had been critical of him, you know, a couple of days earlier, shows that he has the ability and the understanding to realize that there are going to be disagreements and you've got to be able to reach out to the entire party.
I have healthy disagreements with political parties I'm not aligned with, but I don't think it should be to the point where we're cursing and trying to strangle each other.
Our party is united. At times, some people may have disagreements and leave, but it is not a big issue.
Successful negotiation is not about getting to 'yes'; it's about mastering 'no' and understanding what the path to an agreement is.
The principle of majority does not work when differences on fundamentals are involved.
My parents always worked through their arguments and never went to bed angry. They may not have agreed with one another, but they didn't let that disagreement stop them from laying with one another in peace at night.
Practice the 101 Percent Principle. Whenever possible, find the 1 percent you do agree on in a difficult situation, and give it 100 percent of your effort.
When the conversation started to move to the things that we disagreed on, Donald Trump moved it back to the things that we could agree on. I think that's the way you get deals done, right? You and I might disagree 80% of the time but that still gives us 20% opportunity to try to work things out.
Normally, at a debate or a town hall, I would be quick to say to someone, 'That was rude,' or, 'We're going to try to keep it civil here,' or, 'Let's not have personal attacks.'
Whether in conversation we generally agree or disagree with others is largely a matter of habit: the one tendency makes as much sense as the other.
Just because you might have a sparring match on the air doesn't mean there's any personal animosity.
Skillful conversationalists can explore disagreements and make points in ways that feel constructive and positive rather than combative or corrective.
The hardest thing in the world, I now know, is to hold in your head that it is okay to think that you are right, but not to think so necessarily because everyone who disagrees with you is wrong or stupid or duped or bad.
Arguing with somebody is never pleasant, but sometimes it is useful and necessary to do so.
I know Jim Cornette says the reason that I'm successful now is because I changed my attitude, and I must be listening to what people tell me now, and I used to not listen to him. But the thing is, I used to not listen to him or question his methods because I didn't agree with him, and I didn't share his vision.
I taught my executive team how to argue.
Consultation is a good thing when people agree with you, and a waste of time when people don't agree with you
I don't need to air any differences of opinion in public.
I do not love strife, because I have always found that in the end each remains of the same opinion.
We cannot have that relationship if we only dictate or threaten and condemn those who disagree.
