I have written this treatise because there are judges who decide cases according to their own will rather than by the authority of the laws
It would depend on whether a judge of the Supreme Court came down heads or tails.
I'm aware more than I was before I had books published that any review is a bit arbitrary - it's not really, say, 'The New York Times' that's authoritatively weighing in on the quality of a book, though it seems this way to the public.
Football has end zones and goal posts; basketball has the hoop, and hockey the goal cage. Baseball is the only game with an imaginary box: the strike zone, which the umpire determines at his own discretion.
Art is subject to arbitrary fashion.
You are going to be measured anyway by some means, fair or foul. Usually the one doing the measuring has nothing specific in mind; so he does it by the seat of his pants. Careers are destroyed in this manner.
I do think things like old furniture and art are arbitrarily assigned. And I say that coming from an uneducated place in terms of, you know... art... curating. But who's to say what's valuable and what's not? I guess I feel like in the end it's all pretty meaningless 'cause we're all going to die.
I couldn't write a political song. There's just opinion; it's all arbitrary anyway. It's all subjective.
The strike zone should be what the rule book says it is and not a personal idiosyncrasy.
I don't like to leave anything in the hands of the judges.
I don't know who decided that skinny was more appealing than not skinny. It seems arbitrary.
