Charlamagne tha God Quotes

It's a very important thing to learn to talk to people you disagree with.

…in every locality we should look beyond our noses; and at least say nothing on points where it is probable we shall disagree.

I have disagreements with some and more agreements with others. But that doesn't mean I cannot listen to those I disagree with.

I want people to talk to one another no matter what their difference of opinion might be.

I never make the mistake of arguing with people for whose opinions I have no respect.

We may disagree on some things, but we can do so without being disagreeable.

We can argue and we can disagree, but we don’t need to poke our fingers in each other’s eyes in order to get our points across.

You have to be able to interact with people whose politics you disagree with.

Dialogue can be held with everyone. It is not necessary to be like-minded to hold talks, but it is compulsory to be right-minded.

I don't have to agree with everything you say, but I should attempt at least to understand it, for the opposite of mutual understanding is, quite simply, war.

I enjoy being around people who disagree with me; and I enjoy being in non-political contexts and activities.

You can tell if someone is about social intercourse or just about browbeating somebody with their opinion. It's no fun arguing with a closed-minded person.

My own experience is use the tools that are out there. Use the digital world. But never lose sight of the need to reach out and talk to other people who don't share your view. Listen to them and see if you can find a way to compromise.

Dialogue between people of differing views is critical for fostering understanding in a democracy.

I am totally down with disagreement. I don't like Haterade, but disagreement is wonderful. When someone disagrees, we try to reach common ground. That's good.

We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't.

Hear the other side.

The belief in the therapeutic and redemptive force of dialogue depends on the assumption … that, after all, no idea is worth fighting over to the death and that we can always reach a position of accommodation if only we will sit down and talk it out

You don't promote the cause of peace by talking only to people with whom you agree.

I think it's important to understand people can disagree on things, and still move forward.

If you come out of the gate with a finger pointed, then you really aren't opening the door to any sort of resolution to whatever the problem may be. Whether it's about race or sexual orientation or religion, if you can't empathize with the opposing party, then you can't really meet in the middle.

I don't mind have an uncomfortable conversation if those uncomfortable conversations can lead to a bigger dialogue and help us get to a better understanding of whatever it is we are discussing.

You don't see people that are willing to say 'You know what, you might be different politically, but let's find some common ground, let's find ways that we're actually similar.' We just assume immediately that we have nothing in common, what can even talk to that person about.

There is a way to disagree with someone, but it doesn't have to be threatening.

I am completely in favour of dialogue and engagement. But it must be a true, open dialogue.