Marine Le Pen Quotes

Wild globalization has helped some people much, but has hurt most.

The biggest problem is that the rich people paying the bills do not share the same goals as the poor people they are trying to help. The wealthy have weak incentives to get the right amount of the right thing to those who need it; the poor are in no position to complain if they don’t.

Those who promise to spread the wealth around, only succeed in spreading poverty around.

Inequality of income is bad for everyone, not just the poor and the middle class.

While we have created prosperity for many, too many are being left behind.

Globalization obviously has the potential to be good. That doesn't mean it's good for everybody. There's a very large number of people in India and China who benefited directly from globalization, but it doesn't mean everybody in America benefits from globalization.

We have to stop letting people come in here and make millionaires and billionaires of themselves off of West Virginia while West Virginia remains poor.

It's no sin to make a critical study of Brazil's reality. A small percentage own land. Most people don't.

It turns out that globalisation, while promising sameness through brand-name consumption, was fostering, through uneven economic growth, an intense feeling of difference.

The differences in income between the poor world and the rich world are so great that people have to be interested.

Globalization, as defined by rich people like us, is a very nice thing... you are talking about the Internet, you are talking about cell phones, you are talking about computers. This doesn't affect two-thirds of the people of the world.

And if you look at the reality in the United States, where you have more than 40 million people below the poverty line and 42 million on food stamps, and then you look at poverty around the world, clearly the way we're running the engine of capitalism is not serving us well.

One of the fundamental questions of today's world is undoubtedly the question of equitable globalisation.

If you're totally illiterate and living on one dollar a day, the benefits of globalization never come to you.

It's true across the U.K. that those who had least to do with causing the economic crisis are carrying the heaviest burden. That's unacceptable.

The middle class, that prisoner of the barbarian 20th century.

Inequality is on the rise.

The issue of wealth inequality is ... the great moral issue of our time.

Globalization has benefited middle-income less than either richer or poorer countries.

Poverty is the parent of revolution.

Hunger, the inseparable companion of the poor, is the offspring of the unequal distribution of the wealth and the injustices in this world. The rich do not know hunger.

The real threat to the democracy is the half a nation in poverty.

Why should there be such abject poverty?

One must denounce the economic, financial, and social mechanisms and structures that are manipulated by the rich and powerful for their own benefit at the expense of the poor

…national wealth, especially when carefully accumulated in the hands of a few individuals, is dangerous in the extreme to human liberty.