Suzan DelBene Quotes

I promoted Hyderabad to the world by saying that there was privacy in India and their data will be sage. Data is wealth.

In the US, you even lose legal rights if you store your data in a company's machines instead of your own. The police need to present you with a search warrant to get your data from you; but if they are stored in a company's server, the police can get it without showing you anything.

If we as a society do not understand 'the cloud,' in all its aspects - what data it holds, how it works, what the bargains are we make as we engage with it, we'll all be the poorer for it, I believe.

I support safeguarding users' personally identifiable information and sensitive data like health or financial records. I also believe the government has a responsibility to punish deceptive and unfair practices that defy reasonable expectations about consumers' privacy.

The cloud is still really just a bunch of servers, owned by someone or something, whose decisions and competence must be trusted. This applies to everything from Google Docs to Gmail: Putting our data out there really means putting it 'out there.'

When documents were analog, they were protected by government laws against unreasonable search and seizure. When they live in the cloud... the ground is shifting.

In the U.S., you even lose legal rights if you store your data in a company's machines instead of your own. The police need to present you with a search warrant to get your data from you; but if they are stored in a company's server, the police can get it without showing you anything. They may not even have to give the company a search warrant.

In this era of massive online connectivity, the majority of privacy breaches and data leaks remain unknown, unchallenged, and unregulated. Regulatory compliance alone cannot ensure privacy.

Hopefully, the world will not have a lot of different privacy standards requirements--particularly some commonality between the United States and Europe.

Apple and Google want to create encryption for which they could not provide you the key. Their business model will not survive if the American government has a special relationship with them that requires them to surrender this kind of information.

ISIS' key social media-encrypted platform is Telegram, which is engineered by a Berlin-based tech company that can simply ignore the rulings of American federal judges as well as legislation passed by the U.S. Congress.

I think the Supreme Court has not yet caught up to an era in which one keeps one's papers in a cloud, not a castle.

Americans have a right to the security of their personal information, and the entities that hold personal information have a responsibility to protect it.

While encryption protects against cyberattacks, deploying it in warrant-proof form jeopardizes public safety more generally.

It is a fiction to imagine that the haphazard paper chits of old are more private than the modern digital alternative. Paper records have always presented a security risk.

Unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day, you should delete WhatsApp from your phone.

All too often, vital electronic evidence has been made unavailable through encryption that doesn't allow for execution of legal process including court-approved search warrants.

It would be a matter of concern for government if intrusive data capture has been deployed against Indian citizens or government infrastructure.

As we work to secure our data and communications from hackers, we must recognize that our citizens face a far broader array of threats.

With original cryptography, you are just trying to secure one narrow thing - say, communications - and you are trying to secure it from a third party. But you can't secure it from the party you are talking to if they forward your email; it doesn't matter how well your email is encrypted.

The National Tracing Center is not allowed to have centralized computer data.

We need to pass measures that protect consumers' private information while also encouraging new technological innovations.

We all have legitimate concerns over the way our personal data is used and stored and it is right that there are protections to stop the theft and manipulation of our private information.

There should be an understanding and trust that your privacy and data will be protected.

Our personal data belongs to us. Government holds it on trust.