John Hamilton Quotes


This synod exhorts that neither prelates nor their subordinate clergy keep their offspring born of concubinage in their company, nor suffer them directly or indirectly to be promoted in their churches.


Citations

John Hamilton, 1532?-1604, Catholic Archbishop of St. Andrew, Scotland, Synod Report, 1552

Sourced by: Eigen's Political and Historical Quotations

Related Quotes

This was not original with Mobuto. It came from an famous legal opinion in a California case. See {584276}


Adams and Benjamin Franklin served as Ministers to France to obtain assistance for the Revolution. Franklin was masterly successful in arranging French economic and military assistance. Adams however was not. He was very uncomfortable in Paris and the sexuality was particularly distressing to him. Franklin, in contrast, not only was not distressed but was a favorite amongst French ladies even at his advanced age.


Under the power of excommunication, the children of the offender were also shunned and penalized, losing not only religious privileges but many civil rights as well. In 1690 “civil pains and penalties consequent upon excommunication” were abolished in Scotland.


Chesterton was an opponent of birth control. This statement which is true in many cases, breaks down in many of those instances where the conception was not planned and the potential parents have not made a free choice.


This was an amazingly controversial quotation. At first glance it seemed like a typical position that a very conservative, anti-government politicization might take—the government should not interfere with a parents bringing up their children. However, there was a more ominous part of the quotations. While everyone in America would certainly agree with Paul that the Government does not “own” the children, there are few who would agree with the point that follows—that the Parents “own” the child. Paul reveals the normally hidden aspect of his politics—that he is highly influenced by the extreme, Biblical Literalist Fundamentalist Christians and Jews. In the Old Testament, the Father really did OWN the child. The latter was his chattel. A father had the legal and duty-bound power of life and death over his children. Most American Christians and Jews have long since abandoned the literal biblical notion of children being owned by a father and today see a child as a person who can sometimes need the protection of the state just like any other citizen. And there are occasions where the child must be PROTECTED from the parents who may be acting within their fundamentalist notions of Biblical rights and duties, but not with their civil rights and duties. Ownership, of a child is not one of the modern civil rights of parents.


No Photo Available
  • Born:
  • Died: April 26, 1604
  • Nationality: Scottish
  • Profession:

John Hamilton, 1st Marquess of Hamilton (1540–1604) was the founder of the long line of the marquesses and dukes of Hamilton.