Stefan Molyneux Quotes

I think that there are certain guns that, of course, I don't know who needs a machine gun, personally. But I think rifles and things like that are fine. I think that in the wrong hand is when a gun becomes a problem.

I think that we may lose the argument, but I think we have to talk about gun control.

I came to Ottawa with the firm belief that the only people in this country who should have guns are police officers and soldiers.

I don't support any gun-control legislation - the effort for a new assault-weapons ban, with a ban on semiautomatic weapons, is something I would oppose.

This is one of the major problems we have. By the way, it was endorsed by leadership on both sides of the aisle and both ends of the Capitol, by the NRA and also by the gun control groups.

Gun control means control. It means control for the government and the government starts controlling the people.

Stop using the word’s “gun control”. All the 2nd Amendment enthusiasts hear is CONTROL. Let’s use “gun violence”, “gun safety” and other terms that are less confrontational.

Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 would prohibit manufacture and sales, but it would not affect weapons already possessed. This would leave millions of assault weapons in our communities for decades to come.

I am for the Second Amendment, but I am for common-sense gun legislation.

The Brady Bill's only effect will be to desensitize the public to regulation of weapons in preparation for their ultimate confiscation.

The Democrats really are not interested in keeping guns out of the hands of terrorists. They're interested in keeping you from being able to get guns.

I know that there are people out there who believe we should get rid of all guns.

To a lot of people, the Second Amendment is an extreme position.

Innocent Americans are murdered, and what happens? An entire political party and an amendment to the US Constitution gets blamed.

I won't yield to anyone about guns in our society. I know enough about it.

The key fallacy of so called gun control laws is that such laws do not in fact control guns. They simply disarm law abiding citizens, while people bent on violence find firearms readily available.

I think people should have the right to bear arms, but they should be limited as to what kinds of guns they can have.

People who believe in gun control are ignorant, superstitious or stupid.

Why are guns the only unregulated consumer products in America? We regulate toy guns and teddy bears, but we do not regulate a product that kills 4,600 children a year.

I tend to agree with my husband, that to continue the conversation about something that is an important topic, particularly now, which is that of gun control, through his narrative, which is actually what's happened, I don't think it was a conscious decision of, "That's what we're going to do," but that's what seems to have happened, and that's not a bad thing.

For my part, I wish all guns with their belongings and everything could be sent to hell, which is the proper place for their exhibition and use.

Legal gun ownership always prevails over the emotionalism of the gun control movement.

Yes, Dr. King is pro-gun just as surely as Jesus would be pro-nails.

There is absolutely no disconnect between common sense gun safety measures and protecting the Second Amendment rights of gun owners.

I strongly support the Second Amendment and I believe the Second Amendment ought to be preserved - which means no gun control.