Aleksandr Dugin Quotes

It’s not a dictatorship in the United States. But it is dictatorial to the rest of the world. Who’s going to say no?

If I were remaking the United Nations there would only be one permanent representative—the United States because that’s the real reflection of the distribution of power in the world.

The time has come to recognize that the U.S. will continue to exercise unprecedented power in a world where international rules are still unreliable and where security and advancing of the free democratic order still depend significantly on the possession and use of military might.

We have to really get used to the fact that there is more than one center in the world politics, that the unipolar world never succeeded, that there are more growing, emerging, economic, financial powers…

Our alliances should be understood as a means to expand our influence, not as a constraint on our power. The expansion of democracy and freedom in the world should be a shared interest and value with all nations.

Just as the United States doesn't like others to take charge, other countries also don't like the United States to play a dominant role in the United Nations.

In the United Nations, the United States can almost always get its way…. The United States has the ability to make the United Nations work or not work---if it cares enough.

Whoso desireth to govern well and securely, it behoveth him to have a vigilant eye to the proceedings of great princes, and to consider seriously of their designs.

We’re not the world’s policeman. Nor the world’s judge, jury and executioner.

We have become a great nation, forced by the fact of its greatness into relations with the other nations of the earth.

It looks like the so-called "winners" of the Cold War are determined to have it all, and reshape the world into a place that could better serve their interests alone.

Both Russia and the United States are struggling to define their proper roles in the world.

I'm in favour of a multi-polar world. I believe that every country has the right to defend its own interests.

There will always be nations. The United States will last a long, long time, I believe. France and Germany and Japan, China, other nations, they're going to exist. But they're losing their significance and ability to deal with certain matters.

Global conditions are far too complex to be able to imagine that they could ever be really controlled by one power.

Americans tend to see U.S. primacy as beneficial to both their country and the rest of the world.

Multilateralism is regarded as somehow un-American, a trick by which foreigners seek to sap the strength and authority of the United States.

Multilateralism may be little more than a polite way of camouflaging what is in practice unilateralism with allies.

Unilateralism will lead to the decline of American Power.

People the world over now see democracy promotion as a dishonest, dangerous cover for the protection of U. S. power and influence.

Is the balance of power a fixed and unalterable standard? Or is it not a standard perpetually varying, as civilization advances, and as new nations spring up, and take their place among established political communities?

Great powers are granted the legitimacy to exercise power on the global stage, but the price is a willingness to act—at least at the margins and consistent with their self-interest—for the common good.

Power is the true reserve currency in international affairs.

It is the natural desire of each nation to use the other as an instrument of its own purposes and policies. By dint of our mutual dependence, your influence is amplified by our power. Our power is made more responsible and more effective by your influence.

Under the George W. Bush Administration…, the United States was generally seen as having the capacity and resolve, to pursue its own agenda in complete disregard of other states’ preferences.