Charles Bass Quotes

The Cox Committee found that the Chinese military acquired many of the technologies over the past seven years, although many of them had been targeted for acquisition for more than a quarter century.

As a nation we have, over the past seven years, been rebuilding our intelligence with powerful capabilities that many thought we would no longer need after the Cold War. We have been rebuilding our clandestine service, our satellite and other technical collection, our analytical depth and expertise.

A nation's ability to fight a modern war is as good as its technological ability.

Intelligence isn’t just something for the Cold War. When you think of Pearl Harbor, you can understand why. Unpleasant surprises are out there.

The United States historicaly has had its military more closely connected with new technology than any other coutnry.

Our nation's military is effective because it is nonpartisan, relies heavily on science and technology, and takes the world as it is, not as it wishes it to be.

As a national security aid, I worked with our military to strengthen our national defense.

In my judgment, us assisting the Chinese military in advancing technologically is not in U.S. national interests.

Anne Arundel County has become the world's epicenter of military intelligence and defense-related information technology.

Streamlining the army with Chinese characteristics is the right choice for China in military modernization.

We will strengthen our security by building missile defense, restoring our military might, and standing by and strengthening our intelligence officers.

The danger of having the military take over intelligence is that the military has a very different perspective on the world.

We learned the value of research in World War II.

What a jolly thing military surveillance is!

I think that, in the end, the military behavior and intelligence services are not very different from each other. It's an attitude of hunters; they're observing the prey.

It is only the enlightened ruler and the wise general who will use the highest intelligence of the army for the purposes of spying, and thereby they achieve great results.

Our nation must manage significant national security challenges over the next several years. We are already facing a potential conflict with Iraq, new challenges on the Korean peninsula, and key decisions in the president's plans to transform the military.

I have always had a keen interest in defence and military history and read more on this subject than anything else.

Getting our military back on stable footing won't happen overnight. We must start this process now, since future engagements are likely and allies are scarce.

When you write a high-tech thriller, and then people in the defense establishment start calling you - people I can't name - you feel you've hit a nerve.

While the CDC is focusing on how our enemies could attack us, our military is focused on who may attack us.

WikiLeaks presents a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States.

Military intelligence is a contradiction in terms.

The skills of the British intelligence community are a great national asset.

Like any good spy novel, the Cox Report alleges that Chinese spies penetrated four U.S. weapons research labs and stole important information on seven nuclear warhead designs.