Yogi Adityanath Quotes

Terrorist infiltration should be resisted not at the national level, but at the international policies level.

You can’t have open borders and win the war against terrorism at the same time.

The numbers of terrorists that we have caught coming - we actually don't catch them coming across the border. We usually catch them in some other context.

Switzerland is part of the fight against terrorism. There is no neutrality against this threat.

Fences would be a hindrance to terrorists should they decide to come across a land border between the U.S. and Mexico and to California.

Britain has a Terrorism Act, which has within it a portion called Schedule 7, which is quite unique. What it is is it gives officials the ability to detain people at the border as they go in or out or even transit through the country.

In the fight against terrorism, national agencies keep full control over their police forces, security and intelligence agencies and judicial authorities.

We need to enact a strong standard that will stop a terrorist or illegal alien from getting a driver's license because border security is a major concern in a post-September 11th world.

Our ports and our borders are the most unprotected fronts in the war on terror.

American credibility in the war on terrorism depends on a strong stand against all terrorist acts, whether committed by foe or friend.

We have terrorists coming into the country both through our Northern and Southern borders.

We can't be politically correct - right or left - in the war on terrorism. Period.

To win the war on terror, we must know who our friends are and where our enemies are hiding. We can't continue fighting terrorism using the same foreign policy blueprints that were in place before September 11th.

Mr. Chairman, on September 11, we were attacked by terrorists who took advantage of weaknesses in our border security. After infiltrating our country, the terrorists were able to conceal their real identities, and thereby plot their attacks without fear of being apprehended.

The administration asserts that two thirds or three quarters of al-Qaeda’s managers have been captured or killed, and that al-Qaeda must therefore be on the ropes. Why spend vast sums defending against it?

Are we in a state of war against terrorism, or does that require a declaration in order for us to fight.

I have no doubt that if you’re going to fight terrorism you must have a secure, national personal, identification system

Fighting terrorists does not require half a trillion dollars worth of conventional and nuclear forces.

“Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States"

The American people are a welcoming and generous people. But those who enter our country illegally, and those who employ them, disrespect the rule of law. And because we live in an age where terrorists are challenging our borders, we simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, and unchecked. Americans are right to demand better border security and better enforcement of the immigration laws.

There's no national strategy to deal with combating terrorism and foreign fighters.

The Republic will destroy terrorism.

The nature of Homeland Security is that no news is good news. And no news sometimes means somebody got interdicted at the border, somebody got interdicted before they could get on an airplane, somebody was arrested providing material support to terrorism. Homeland Security means very often something you never hear about.

We have to make sure we control who enters our country. And we have to sustain and increase our efforts to fight the terrorists at their source, both on the ground and in the battle for hearts and minds.

I think people all across the country want us to secure the border and make sure that terrorists are not coming into our country.