Karamo Brown Quotes

I'm considered homophobic and crazy about these things and old fashioned. But I think that the family - father, mother, children - is fundamental to our civilisation.

I think it's important to show a husband and a wife together, in a room, raising children, because you don't see that anymore.

Fathers should be neither seen nor heard. That is the only proper basis for family life.

What I do say is, yes, children may be resilient and they have been able to deal with all sorts of difficulties they have faced, but the bottom line is this: I believe very strongly children need a mother and a father in the home.

Studies show that children best flourish when one mom and one dad are there to raise them.

Kids need a mom and a dad, and people understand that. Marriage between a mom and a dad is most important for kids.

I feel that heterosexual marriage is the more excellent way, and it surely is approved holy by the Holy Bible, and it holds so many more possibilities: the possibilities of having children of both the mother and father, the male and the female.

The traditional family has an intrinsic as well as an instrumental value, and that is the real reason so many conservatives defend it.

I can't think of anything worse than being brought up by two gay dads.

While having two biological parents at home is, the statistics tell us, best for children, a single-parent household is almost as good.

Growing up in the fifties and sixties, I can only remember knowing one child, ever, whose parents got a divorce, and hardly any whose mother 'worked' at anything besides raising her children.

My father was a great innovator in public life, but when it came to raising his daughters, no one could have been more conservative.

The Lord clearly defined the roles of providing for and rearing a righteous posterity. In the beginning, Adam, not Eve, was instructed to earn the bread by the sweat of his brow.

Children that are raised in a home with a married mother and father consistently do better in every measure of well-being than their peers who come from divorced or step-parent, single-parent, cohabiting homes.

The four of us enjoyed a most wonderful family atmosphere filled with love and reciprocal devotion. Both parents were highly cultured and instilled in us their high appreciation of intellectual pursuit. It was, however, a typical Victorian style of life, all decisions being taken by the head of the family, the husband and father.

My argument is simple, which is, that for several thousand years in Western civilization, marriage has been the union of one man and one woman. Research is overwhelming that children need mothers and fathers.

I don't think a female running a house is a problem, a broken family. It's perceived as one because of the notion that a head is a man.

I'm the youngest of six children; both of my sisters are housewives and they each have four kids.

Those days of every child having a mummy and daddy who lived at home - Daddy went to work, and Mummy stayed at home and took care of everyone - those days have almost gone, and it's so much more unconventional now.

I believe in the natural order where the man works and the woman stays home and raises the kids. It's what the people want and what they will get if I'm elected governor.

We are redefining the concept of marriage to say that fathers are optional.

I realize that I was being the kind of parent that I thought my daughter needed. I was a good role model for her on what a working mom can do.

The role of matriarch and patriarch are distinct, and in the King family, we have been blessed with strong examples of both.

Thousands of years of human history have shown that the ideal setting for children to grow up is with a mother and a father committed to one another, living together, and sharing the responsibility of raising their children.

My father worked in a bank while my mother looked after my four brothers and me, the only girl in our family.