Phil Jones Quotes

The fantastic advances in the field of electronic communication constitute a greater danger to the privacy of the individual.

There is a big problem. It's called encryption. And the people in San Bernardino were communicating with people who the FBI had been watching. But because their phone was encrypted, because the intelligence officials could not see who they were talking to, it was lost.

If information is collected, it will be compromised. People have no idea of the way that data collected for one purpose may be used for another.

Privacy and confidentiality have always been among our core values. So the question is how to remain true to them in a changing technological and legal environment

Per Sr. Mgmt request, these data should not see the light of day to anyone outside of GSK.

… corporations do almost everything that the federal government has been banned from doing under various laws, in particular the Privacy Act of 1974.

In this era of massive online connectivity, the majority of privacy breaches and data leaks remain unknown, unchallenged, and unregulated. Regulatory compliance alone cannot ensure privacy.

The federal government has an exceptionally poor record of behaving responsibly with Americans' personal information when entrusted with it.

Our values are that we do think that people have a right to privacy. And that our customers are not our products.

So far, we have a perfect record of WikiLeaks having never revealed information that exposed a source over 10 years.

While the Census Bureau already has a legal obligation to keep people's information confidential, we all know that in an age of cyber attacks and computer hacking that ensuring people's privacy can be difficult.

If we start - premise that the information is mine, and we give the individual's rights, we worry about what happens during a breach. If you try to protect access to it, as opposed to not even making it available, you have less to worry about who will break the wall.

Data is valuable, so let's be mindful of how we're sharing it.

Americans have a right to the security of their personal information, and the entities that hold personal information have a responsibility to protect it.

We can't allow somebody to create a service like that, which reveals who's looking at your page. That's a violation of privacy.

It is a fiction to imagine that the haphazard paper chits of old are more private than the modern digital alternative. Paper records have always presented a security risk.

DMs are a lot like email - and should have the same privacy protections as a mailed letter.

With original cryptography, you are just trying to secure one narrow thing - say, communications - and you are trying to secure it from a third party. But you can't secure it from the party you are talking to if they forward your email; it doesn't matter how well your email is encrypted.

We need to pass measures that protect consumers' private information while also encouraging new technological innovations.

There should be an understanding and trust that your privacy and data will be protected.

Privacy and security are the ultimate shared responsibility, and everyone - including governments, companies, and citizens - have an important role to play.

Looking back, there hasn't been a single day in WhatsApp's 10 year journey when this service was secure.

When we talk with policymakers about Facebook, it's about how users have control over information.

With the evolution of information technology, there have emerged new questions, for example, of data and privacy.

People want to have some assurance that their privacy, their data is going to be protected.