Liam Neeson Quotes

I tend to agree with my husband, that to continue the conversation about something that is an important topic, particularly now, which is that of gun control, through his narrative, which is actually what's happened, I don't think it was a conscious decision of, "That's what we're going to do," but that's what seems to have happened, and that's not a bad thing.

I understand the Second Amendment. I support it. People have the right to bear arms.

I know that there are people out there who believe we should get rid of all guns.

I kind of think we have too many guns in this country.

I think that we may lose the argument, but I think we have to talk about gun control.

To a lot of people, the Second Amendment is an extreme position.

People who believe in gun control are ignorant, superstitious or stupid.

The Second Amendment is outdated in the sense that its function has become obsolete.

Hillary Clinton wants to abolish - essentially abolish - the Second Amendment.

I don't support any gun-control legislation - the effort for a new assault-weapons ban, with a ban on semiautomatic weapons, is something I would oppose.

I support an assault weapons ban, and I'll tell you why. We already have one in California, so I don't support doing anything above what we do in California.

Americans have the right under the Second Amendment to own firearms, and that is not going to change.

Stop using the word’s “gun control”. All the 2nd Amendment enthusiasts hear is CONTROL. Let’s use “gun violence”, “gun safety” and other terms that are less confrontational.

You can have a Second Amendment right, but not a Second Amendment right to an AR-15.

There is a recognition that Second Amendment rights, like First Amendment and other rights, come with responsibilities and limitations. There is no reason both sides of the gun debate can't support policies that both protect the right to legally own guns for sport and safety, and reduce the likelihood of mass fatalities.

Always remember Rahm Emanuel and those of his ilk who are opposed to our fundamental civil right to keep and bear arms when you donate to NRA-ILA or the NRA Civil Rights Legal Defense Fund.

I am for the Second Amendment, but I am for common-sense gun legislation.

There's a reason why the NRA's not here. They're just down the street. And since this is the main reason they exist, you'd think that they'd be prepared to have a debate with a president.

There's a deeper conversation to be had on guns, and just because I happen to know where I fall into that conversation doesn't mean that I don't want to have that conversation.

I think that there are certain guns that, of course, I don't know who needs a machine gun, personally. But I think rifles and things like that are fine. I think that in the wrong hand is when a gun becomes a problem.

The Founding Fathers did not believe the primary purpose of their guns was to hunt ducks, but to keep the government in line within the bounds of the Constitution. The Founding Fathers said that armed citizens are a bulwark against a tyrant in the White House.

I won't yield to anyone about guns in our society. I know enough about it.

I think people should have the right to bear arms, but they should be limited as to what kinds of guns they can have.

The Second Amendment! It says you have the right to bear arms, or the right to arm bears, whatever the hell you want to do!