Chris Grayling Quotes

If Europe's outer border is not blocked off, it makes no sense to speak of quotas.

Europe can't take in huge masses of foreign people in an unlimited, uncontrolled manner.

Let's get real: would any American president seriously open up their borders unconditionally to Mexico as the U.K. has done to the whole of the E.U.? No chance.

I am against the policy which would promote the entry of immigrants into Europe, which cannot accept them.

I am in favour of migration; I simply want to control the numbers.

We can bring immigration down to sustainable levels.

We must have the courage to restrict legal immigration instead of expanding it, even if we sometimes have to build a wall.

Freedom from the E.U. can only be beneficial for our country. We could finally take control of our immigration policies, introduce a fairer system, and keep numbers at a sustainable level that benefits our economy.

We should return to Howard-era immigration levels in NSW.

Trump is a cultural candidate for president, not an economic one. He clearly loves America and wants America to stay America. America won't be America if it has open borders and mass Muslim immigration.

We believe in immigration, but we don't believe in mass immigration.

Surely everyone can agree that immigration should be controlled.

The government rightly resisted pressure to accept Free Movement of people from E.U. countries, to allow us to regain control over our immigration policy.

We can control our borders, we just choose not too.

I'm not saying we need to stop immigration at all; people can come from wherever.

I respect those who openly advocate for unlimited immigration to the United States. Open borders is an intellectually coherent, defensible position.

Our country was founded on immigration. We are all occupying Native American land here. At what point do we say 'It's our land, and nobody else can come here.'

I'm in favor of immigration but we also need rules.

We are not going to build a pressure in Mexico. We're not building walls to retain our people.

I personally believe that a democratic society is morally entitled to set and enforce a limit on the number of new immigrants admitted each year.

Protecting national security amounts to looking for needles in a haystack. The work becomes more difficult if the haystack is larger. Restricting immigration generally, and illegal immigration in particular, limits growth in the haystack, and supports protection of national security.

We will decide who comes to our country.

I don't know the right number of immigrants to let in.

The U. S.'s moral responsibility to accept immigrants is not unlimited.

There should not be any immigration policy. We should welcome anyone who wants to come here.