Alaina Huffman Quotes

It's clear that science and science fiction have overlapping populations.

Everything is becoming science fiction. From the margins of an almost invisible literature has sprung the intact reality of the 20th century.

Millions of students now, in all the schools of America, are reading science fiction and especially, thank God, 'The Martian Chronicles.'

I'm a science-fiction fan. All science fiction ends up being reality.

Science fiction writers, when I was a kid, were a big deal.

I love the fact that it's not only about Star Trek, but about science fiction in general, and science.

I dig science fiction, though it was never really my thing.

I'd always been a science fiction enthusiast.

Zombies, vampires, Frankenstein's monster, robots, Wolfman - all of this stuff was really popular in the '50s. Robots are the only one of those make-believe monsters that have become real. They are really in our lives in a meaningful way. That's pretty fascinating to me.

Science fiction offers an intensely bracing angle of view for writers to adopt, especially in a time of constant innovation and crisis, and it is a scandal that in 1999 so many writers have written it and continue to write it in obscurity.

I like science fiction. I am quite a technologically kind of up-to-date person. I like seeing what the new developments are.

Science fiction I've always been a fan of.

I have this theory about science fiction movies in that, when the space race sort of died, a lot of people sort of lost hope.

Whatever science fiction movies we watch now, we can make the technology real in two days. What we can do is not important. What we should do is more important.

Science fiction is the very literature of change.

The paucity of near-future U.S. scifi is about the country becoming pessimistic, not being able to see the future clearly. There's a trend in U.S. scifi towards militarism and far-future stuff.

I'm a futurist. Technology is our way out of almost every problem we have. Technology can create a new sense of community.

When I wrote 'Neuromancer', I had a list in my head of all the things the future was assumed to be which it would not be in the book I was about to write. In a sense, I intended 'Neuromancer', among other things, to be a critique of all the aspects of science fiction that no longer satisfied me.

Well, I grew up in the '80s, which was a really massive time for sci-fi.

I am a sci-fi fan.

I have been a reader of Science Fiction and Fantasy for a long time, since I was 11 or 12 I think, so I understand it and I'm not at all surprised that readers of the genre might enjoy my books.

Science fiction was never my thing. I have no interest in it. So I don't think I could successfully pull off being on a project like that without really losing my mind.

I love sci-fi because it leads in the imagination, and I always say it has the most intelligent fans in the world.

I'm not so interested any more in how a great deal of science fiction goes. It goes into things like Star Wars and Star Trek which all go excellent in their own way.

Yeah I loved, as a kid growing up, I loved science-fiction.