Ronald Reagan Quotes

We need to pass comprehensive immigration reform, period.

I think comprehensive immigration reform while securing your border and dealing rationale with 11 million is the only way we're going to solve this problem.

It is my firm belief that it will be in the interests of the United States, especially our economic interests, to pursue comprehensive immigration reform.

It's clear that we need comprehensive immigration reform.

Immigration reform is a must, an amnesty. So that's my position. I've been pushing that one since before it was popular.

I absolutely advocate for comprehensive immigration reform.

Next, we will create a modern immigration law.

We can pass practical, comprehensive immigration reform.

We have a lot of folks who talk about immigration reform but haven't put their name on a bill.

We must continue to stand up for what's right and push for bipartisan, comprehensive immigration reform.

I want immigration reform to come into fruition, and I want it to be comprehensive, and I want it to have a path to citizenship, and I want to be involved politically every day.

It is clear that United States immigration policy is badly in need of reform.

We can't go on forever with 11 million people living in this country in the shadows in an illegal status. We cannot forever have children who were born here - who were brought here by their parents when they were small children to live in the shadows, as well... What's changed, honestly, is that there is a new appreciation on both sides of the aisle, maybe more importantly on the Republican side, that we need to enact a comprehensive immigration reform bill.

I believe that the Cuban Adjustment Act must be re-examined.

Both parties want it now. They want comprehensive immigration reform, and they want open borders.

Instead of working to undo POTUS exec action, we need to workcollaboratively to achieve comprehensive immigration reform.

I worked 30 years to try to restore respect for the rule of law because of Ronald Reagan's amnesty in 1986. And I don't want to let this go because somebody's heart got a little softer than it was before the election.

Immigration reform should mean something else entirely. It should mean improvements to our laws and policies to make life better for American citizens.

The good news is that we really do think that ... on the immigration issue, that we will, before summer, have comprehensive immigration reform.

We will hear more details on [Donald] Trump's plans on addressing illegal immigration in the speech tonight, including what Trump plans to do about those 11 million illegal immigrants already in the U.S.

I absolutely believe that those who come here illegally should not be given favoritism or a special route to becoming permanent residents or citizens that's not given to those people who have stayed in line legally. I just think we have to follow the law, I think that's the right course.

I really wish that we had passed a comprehensive immigration bill because that would've really helped our country.

Barak Obama said as much today talking about immigration. (imitating Obama) "I don't care what happens today. It is gonna happen. We are going to have comprehensive immigration reform. We're gonna have amnesty for these 11 or 12 million. It's gonna happen. You just wait." And that's the way they go about it. Defeat is not something that, in their minds, is lasting.

So, what exactly is the News-Press' unforgivable crime? Calling illegal aliens 'illegals' in a headline for a story about illegal aliens descending on California DMVs. A new law went into effect last Friday allowing illegal aliens to obtain driver's licenses without proof of lawful residence. The article featured interviews with ecstatic illegal aliens, including one who has been in the country illegally for '22 years.'

I believe we should sunset our visa laws so that Congress is forced to periodically revise and revisit them to bring them up to date. They're archaic. They're ancient. We wouldn't put our entire federal budget on auto pilot for decades, so why should we do the same for the very, very complex subject of immigration?