Albert Einstein Quotes

Divinity is an emotion of being lifted out of yourself and being part of something much bigger than yourself that makes you go, 'Oh my God.' And that sense of awe? It's the second rule of science.

We're all talking about the same thing, whether it's religious people or New Age spiritual people or Buddhists or scientists. We're all talking about having a sense of awe and wonder at something grander than ourselves.

I believe in evolution. But I also believe, when I hike the Grand Canyon and see it at sunset, that the hand of God is there also.

A science which does not bring us nearer to God is worthless.

Nothing teaches us about the preciousness of the Creator as much as when we learn the emptiness of everything else.

Art and Religion are, then, two roads by which men escape from circumstance to ecstasy. Between aesthetic and religious rapture there is a family alliance. Art and Religion are means to similar states of mind.

I believe in a kind of God. I think all scientists, in a way, believe in a certain God, in a certain order of nature.

There's no way that scientists can ever rule out religion, or even have anything significant to say about the abstract idea of a divine creator.

Through history, people look for something spiritual. The greatest scientists in the world were men of religion and faith, too.

Earth's crammed with heaven, And every common bush afire with God: But only he who sees takes off his shoes.

I think science is about the search for God; it just comes at it from a different angle than religion.

I'd be perfectly happy with a mathematically precise description of how time began. I see science and religion as being two completely different things. I don't see science as relevant to the question of whether or not there's a God.

It was tremendously exciting to discover that science was not destroying religion, as people popularly believe, but that it could cast light on theism and Christianity.

Let me say that I consider myself a deep believer in the reality of God. I might define God quite differently from the way some people in the Christian faith would do so, but I do not doubt the reality of that experience.

Gods are fragile things, they may be killed by a whiff of science or a dose of common sense.

My feeling, of course, is that it's ludicrous to try to prove God's existence by science. God has nothing to do with science. God has all to do with soul, and who can explain that?

I believe in God. Spirit, I'm big time on that.

Ultimately, I feel like there is just a pervasive evidence of God. Though I know that is maybe a controversial thing to say.

It is not because there is God that devotion has come; because there is devotion, there is God.

There is a God, even in Hollywood.

Science is about nature. And God, if he exists, transcends nature.

It seems to me that when confronted with the marvels of life and the universe, one must ask why and not just how. The only possible answers are religious. . . . I find a need for God in the universe and in my own life.

I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one.

What is god, what is not god, what is between man and god, who shall say?

God is still in the business of coming down to earth: to this cubicle, this email, this room, this house, this job, this hospital room, this car, this bed, this vacation. Any place can become Bethel, the house of God. Cleveland, maybe. Or the chair you're sitting in as you read these words.